Table 1 Remote perception of graphic material

Table 1. Remote perception of graphic material
Experiment Date (month, day, year) Geller Location Target Location Target Figure
1 8/4/73 Shielded room 1* Adjacent room (4.1 m)† Firecracker la
2 8/4/73 Shielded room I Adjacent room (4.1 m) Grapes 1b
3 8/5/73 Shielded room I Office (475 m) Devil 1c
4 8/5/73 Room adjacent to Shielded room 1 Shielded room I (3.2 m) Solar system 1d
5 8/6/73 Room adjacent to Shielded room 1 Shielded room 1 (3.2 m) Rabbit No drawing
6 8/7/73 Shielded room 1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Tree No drawing
7 8/7/73 Shielded room 1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Envelope No drawing
8 8/8/73 Shielded room 1 Remote room (6.75 m) Camel 1e
9 8/8/73 Shielded room 1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Bridge 1f
10 8/8/73 Shielded room 1 Adjacent room (4.I m) Seagull 1g
11 8/9/73 Shielded room 2‡ Computer (54 m) Kite (computer CRT) 2a
12 8/10/73 Shielded room 2 Computer (54 m) Church (computer memory) 2b
13 8/10/73 Shielded room 2 Computer (54 m) Arrow through heart (computer CRT, zero intensity) 2c
* EEG Facility shielded room (see text).
† Perceivertarget distances measured in metres.
‡ SRI Radio Systems Laboratory shielded room (see text).

**Table 1. Remote perception of graphic material**
Experiment	Date (month, day, year)	Geller Location	Target Location	Target	Figure
1	8/4/73	Shielded room 1*	Adjacent room (4.1 m)†	Firecracker	la
2	8/4/73	Shielded room I	Adjacent room (4.1 m)	Grapes	1b
3	8/5/73	Shielded room I	Office (475 m)	Devil	1c
4	8/5/73	Room adjacent to Shielded room 1	Shielded room I (3.2 m)	Solar system	1d
5	8/6/73	Room adjacent to Shielded room 1	Shielded room 1 (3.2 m)	Rabbit	No drawing
6	8/7/73	Shielded room 1	Adjacent room (4.1 m)	Tree	No drawing
7	8/7/73	Shielded room 1	Adjacent room (4.1 m)	Envelope	No drawing
8	8/8/73	Shielded room 1	Remote room (6.75 m)	Camel	1e
9	8/8/73	Shielded room 1	Adjacent room (4.1 m)	Bridge	1f
10	8/8/73	Shielded room 1	Adjacent room (4.I m)	Seagull	1g
11	8/9/73	Shielded room 2‡	Computer (54 m)	Kite (computer CRT)	2a
12	8/10/73	Shielded room 2	Computer (54 m)	Church (computer memory)	2b
13	8/10/73	Shielded room 2	Computer (54 m)	Arrow through heart (computer CRT, zero intensity)	2c
* EEG Facility shielded room (see text).
† Perceivertarget distances measured in metres.
‡ SRI Radio Systems Laboratory shielded room (see text).

Table 2. Distribution of correct selections by judges A, B, C, D, and E in remote viewing experiments
Descriptions chosen by judges Places visited by judges
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Hoover Tower 1 ABCDE D
Baylands Nature Preserve 2 ABC E D D
Radio Telescope 3 ACD BE
Redwood City Marina 4 CD ABDE E
Bridge Toll Plaza 5 ABD DCE
Drive in Theatre 6 B A C E
Arts and Crafts Garden Plaza 7 ABCE
Church 8 C AB
Rinconada Park 9 CE AB
Of the 45 selections (5 judges, 9 choices), 24 were correct. Bold type indicates the description chosen most often for each place visited. Correct choices lie on the main diagonal. The number of correct matches by Judges A through E is 7, 6, 5, 3, and 3, respectively. The expected number of correct matches from the five judges was five, in the experiment 24 such matches were obtained. The a priori probability of such an occurrence by chance, conservatively assuming assignment without replacement on the part of the judges, is P = 8.10^l0.

**Table 2.** Distribution of correct selections by judges A, B, C, D, and E in remote viewing experiments
Descriptions chosen by judges		Places visited by judges
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
Hoover Tower	1	ABCDE				D
Baylands Nature Preserve	2		ABC	E				D		D
Radio Telescope	3			ACD		BE
Redwood City Marina	4		CD		ABDE		E
Bridge Toll Plaza	5						ABD		DCE
Drive in Theatre	6			B		A	C			E
Arts and Crafts Garden Plaza	7							ABCE
Church	8				C				AB
Rinconada Park	9		CE							AB
Of the 45 selections (5 judges, 9 choices), 24 were correct. Bold type indicates the description chosen most often for each place visited. Correct choices lie on the main diagonal. The number of correct matches by Judges A through E is 7, 6, 5, 3, and 3, respectively. The expected number of correct matches from the five judges was five, in the experiment 24 such matches were obtained. The a priori probability of such an occurrence by chance, conservatively assuming assignment without replacement on the part of the judges, is P = 8.10^l0.

Table 3. EEG data for H.H. shoving average power and peak power in the 9-11 Hz band, as a function of flash frequency and sender
Flash Frequency 0 6 16 0 6 16
Sender Average Power Peak Power
J.L. 94.8 84.1 76.8 357.7 329.2 289.6
R.T. 41.3 45.5 37.0 160.7 161.0 125.0
No sender (subject informed) 25.1 35.7 28.2 87.5 95.7 81.7
J.L. 54.2 55.3 44.8 191.4 170.5 149 3
J.L. 56.8 50.9 32.8 240.6 178.0 104.6
R.T. 39.8 24.9 30.3 145.2 74.2 122.1
No sender (subject not informed) 86.0 53.0 52.1 318.1 180.6 202.3
Averages 56.8 49.9 43.1 214.5 169.8 153.5
-12% -24% (P<0.04) -21% -28% (P<0.03)
Each entry is an average over 12 trials

Flash Frequency	0	6	16	0	6	16
Sender	Average Power			Peak Power
J.L.	94.8	84.1	76.8	357.7	329.2	289.6
R.T.	41.3	45.5	37.0	160.7	161.0	125.0
No sender (subject informed)	25.1	35.7	28.2	87.5	95.7	81.7
J.L.	54.2	55.3	44.8	191.4	170.5	149 3
J.L.	56.8	50.9	32.8	240.6	178.0	104.6
R.T.	39.8	24.9	30.3	145.2	74.2	122.1
No sender (subject not informed)	86.0	53.0	52.1	318.1	180.6	202.3
Averages	56.8	49.9	43.1	214.5	169.8	153.5
	-12% -24% (P<0.04)			-21% -28% (P<0.03)
Each entry is an average over 12 trials